Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Zelnick bullish on AAA iPad games after XCOM success

As part of Take-Two's financial results today, company head Strauss Zelnick noted that Firaxis' strategy title XCOM: Enemy Unknown was in the top 10-grossing iPad apps within the first week of release - a big success for the company.

Talking in the Q&A following the company results, Zelnick noted: "This bodes well for the opportunity to deliver profitably our most immersive new triple-A titles to mobile platforms as they evolve."

He continued: "It?s a matter of just a couple of years before [tablets are] great entertainment platform [for video games]." It seems that the aggressive pricing for the title, which was priced at $19.99 in the U.S. iOS store, ended up working out for the company - in the short term, at least.

Zelnick also commented that the upcoming external iOS game controllers would help the AAA game's cause a lot: "We do need an 'outboard' controller that becomes an industry standard that works for consumers. But I have every reason to believe that a tablet will become a great game platform, and we?ll be right there. I do think we?re a couple years away."

And Zelnick continued: "The truth is consumers pay for what?s of value of them. And obviously we create a product that?s very expensive to make and market, and the price point reflects the intersection of those two things. There really is no reason that if you deliver a great experience on tablets that we should be price-limited."

But, he said if consumers rejected that premium pricing, Take-Two is ?flexible? and could work on other business models.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/fingergaming/~3/VGI256qKeDU/Zelnick_bullish_on_AAA_iPad_games_after_XCOM_success.php

Angie Everhart tom hardy Jessica Ghawi People Water Fred Willard Emmy nominations 2012 Ramadan 2012

TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (TRW) Management Discusses Q2 ...

The following audio is from an earnings conference call that began on July 30, 2013, at 8:30 AM ET. The audio is live-streaming while the call is active, and can be replayed upon its completion.

Which Seeking Alpha App is best for you?

Email me a link to open from my phone:

Source: http://seekingalpha.com/article/1582802-trw-automotive-holdings-corp-trw-management-discusses-q2-2013-results-webcast?source=feed

new mexico state kevin rose sessions march madness scores doonesbury padma lakshmi daughtry

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Therapeutic fecal transplant: Hope for cure of childhood diarrhea comes straight from the gut

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Call it therapeutic poop, if you will, but the best hope yet for an effective treatment of childhood infections with the drug-resistant bacterium C. difficile may come straight from the gut, according to recent research. This is why pediatric gastroenterologists are launching a fecal transplantation program for patients with recurrent diarrhea caused by what they say is a wily pathogen that is increasingly impervious to drugs and a rapidly growing problem among children and adults.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/strange_science/~3/VP43FHq31ps/130729133002.htm

solar storm spanx solar flares mary j blige gcb patricia heaton arsenic and old lace

A Brief History of the Bikini

This piece was originally published in 2006.

Micheline Bernardini, 1946. Micheline Bernardini, 1946.

Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons

Sixty-seven years ago, the world's first bikini made its debut at a poolside fashion show in Paris. The swimsuit is now so ubiquitous?and comparatively so demure?that it's hard to comprehend how shocking people once found it. When the bikini first arrived, its revealing cut scandalized even the French fashion models who were supposed to wear it; they refused, and the original designer had to enlist a stripper instead. The images below illustrate how the bikini slowly gained acceptance?first on the Riviera, then in the United States?and became a beachfront staple.

When the bikini was unveiled in 1946, it was by no means the first time that women had worn so revealing a garment in public. In the fourth century, for example, Roman gymnasts wore bandeau tops, bikini bottoms, and even anklets that would look perfectly at home on the beaches of Southern California today.

Image of the "bikini girls" mosaic at the Piazza Armerina in Sicily. Image of the "bikini girls" mosaic at the Piazza Armerina in Sicily.

Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons

At the turn of the 20th?century, though, such displays would have been unthinkable. Female swimmers went to extraordinary lengths to conceal themselves at the beach. They wore voluminous bathing costumes and even made use of a peculiar Victorian contraption called the bathing machine, essentially a small wooden or canvas hut on wheels. The bather entered the machine fully dressed and donned her swimming clothes inside. Then, horses (or occasionally humans) pulled the cart into the surf. The bather would disembark on the seaside, where she could take a dip without being observed from the shore.

Woman perching on the edge of a bathing machine at an Ostend, Belgium, beach.

Woman perching on the edge of a bathing machine at an Ostend, Belgium, beach.

Photo by Topical Press Agency/Getty Images

Annette Kellerman circa 1905. Annette Kellerman circa 1905.

Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images

In the decades that followed, the seaside dress code loosened up considerably. In 1907, Australian swimmer and silent-film star Annette Kellerman?a vocal advocate of more hydrodynamic swimwear?was charged with indecent exposure for appearing on Boston's Revere Beach in a form-fitting, sleeveless tank suit. The ensuing high-profile legal scuffle led beaches across the nation to relax their swimwear restrictions. By 1915, American women commonly wore one-piece knitted maillots.

Oddly enough, the two-piece swimsuit?which usually consisted of a structured halter top and modest bottom that covered the navel, hips, and derri?re?arrived with much less fanfare than the bikini. By the early '40s, film stars including Ava Gardner, Rita Hayworth, and Lana Turner were all wearing the two-piece, and it was seen frequently on American beaches. Why were the inches of skin above the bellybutton so much less controversial than those below it? Hollywood's Hays production codes allowed two-piece gowns but prohibited navels on-screen. That meant the rib cage earned a ho-hum reputation, but the bellybutton was uncharted territory.

Ava Gardner, Hollywood California, 1941. Ava Gardner, Hollywood, Calif., 1941.

Photo by SNAP/Zuma Press

In the 1940s?as Kelly Killoren Bensimon details in?The Bikini Book?attractive women were known as "bombshells," and anything intense was "atomic." So, when two Frenchmen independently designed skimpy alternatives to the two-piece in the summer of 1946, both suits got nuclear nicknames. The first designer, Jacques Heim, created a tiny suit called the?atome. The second, Louis Reard, introduced his design on July 5, four days after the United States had begun atomic testing in the Bikini Atoll. In a rather bold marketing ploy, Reard named his creation?le bikini, implying it was as momentous an invention as the new bomb.

Thanks to its provocative name and cut, the bikini made international headlines. Photos of Micheline Bernardini, the stripper Reard had enlisted to model it, circulated across the globe. But in the United States, women?including actresses in movies like 1947's?My Favorite Brunette?and the model on?this 1948 cover of?Life magazine?stuck with the traditional two-piece.

Poster of My Favorite Brunette, 1947.

Poster of My Favorite Brunette, 1947.

Image courtesy Everett Collection

In 1950,?Time?interviewed American swimsuit mogul Fred Cole and reported that he had "little but scorn for France's famed Bikini bathing suits," because they were designed for diminutive Gallic women. "French girls have short legs," he explained to?Time. "Swimsuits have to be hiked up at the sides to make their legs look longer."

Brigitte Bardot Brigitte Bardot at the 6th International Cannes Film Festival, 1953.

Photo by LIDO/SIPA

Brigitte Bardot's legs, at least, didn't need the help. This photo was taken at the Cannes Film Festival in 1953, just as the bikini was becoming de rigueur on the French Riviera. Even so, it remained off-limits in the States, where it was seen as a suspect garment favored by licentious Mediterranean types. A few years ago,?Sports Illustrated?dug up a 1957 issue of?Modern Girl that declared: "It is hardly necessary to waste words over the so-called bikini since it is inconceivable that any girl with tact and decency would ever wear such a thing."

Just three summers later, though, the bikini had established a beachhead on these shores. This was in large part because of the increasing popularity of the private pool, which gave women a secluded place to test out the new look. A Neiman Marcus buyer classified the bikini as "a big thing" for 1960. Brian Hyland also had a hit that year with the song "Itsy Bitsy, Teenie Weenie, Yellow Polka Dot Bikini," which takes on new meaning when you realize the swimsuit was still catching on at the time. No wonder the song's protagonist was "afraid to come out of the water."

Bikini beach scene, 1965. Bikini beach scene, 1965.

Photo by Michael Irwin/Rex Features

Still from Dr. No. Still from Dr. No.

Photo courtesy Everett Collection.

The bikini soon became ubiquitous. In 1965, a woman told?Time?it was "almost square" not to wear a bikini?which, given the outlet, suggests she was right. In 1967 the magazine wrote that "65% of the young set had already gone over." The?Sports Illustrated?swimsuit issue debuted in 1964?with?a white bikini on the cover. And the swimsuit's increasing popularity was reinforced by its appearance in contemporary movies like Annette Funicello's?How To Stuff a Wild Bikini?and Raquel Welch's?One Million Years B.C.?One of the bikini's earliest and most memorable film roles came in the 1962 Bond film?Dr. No. (A journalist who saw an advance screening reported, "Actress Ursula Andress fills a wet bikini as if she were going downwind behind twin spinnakers.")

The bikini certainly complemented the va-va-voomery of Raquel Welch and her peers, who tended to be busty and a little soft in the middle. (In early bikini shots, stomachs are often evidently sucked in.) But the 1970s saw the rise of models like?Cheryl Tiegs, who possessed the athletic figure that, for the most part, remains in vogue today. The advent of this lean ideal led many women to wonder: Who, exactly, should wear the bikini? In the 1960s, Emily Post decreed, "It is for perfect figures only, and for the very young." Since then, though, a number of swimwear designers (most notably?Malia Mills) have encouraged women of all ages and body types to take up the style.

Bensimon's lively?Bikini Book?splits the difference on this question. In one Q&A, the author asks venerated swimwear designer Norma Kamali who shouldn't wear the bikini. She responds, "Anyone with a tummy." Eighty-odd pages later, though, professional beach volleyballer Gabrielle Reece (who competes in a bikini) declares that "confidence" alone can make the abbreviated swimsuit sexy. Easy for her to say.

Cheryl Tiegs, Gabrielle Reece Cheryl Tiegs, late 1970s swimsuit poster; volleyball player/actress Gabrielle Reece appears on the set of Cloud Nine at Will Rodgers State Beach on May 12, 2004 in Pacific Palisades, Calif.

Photos courtesy Everett Collection; Stephen Shugerman/Getty Images

Today, you have to wonder whether the thong bikini?which first appeared in Brazil in the 1970s but has since made scant inroads here?will ever become common on American beaches. Never, you say? It's a suspect garment favored by licentious Latin types? Exactly what Americans used to think about the bikini.

Thong bikinis at Copacabana Beach; Eva Herzigova. Thong bikinis at Copacabana Beach, Brazil; woman in bikini.

Photos by Eric Slomanson/ZUMA Press; AFP/Getty.

Whether or not the thong ever makes it out of the lingerie drawer, though, the bikini is here to stay. Still, like most sexagenarians, it's gotten a bit tame: It still has the power to titillate, but it's lost the power to shock.

Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/life/fashion/2013/07/history_of_the_bikini_how_it_came_to_america.html

Stephen Covey klimt breaking bad breaking bad food network star British Open 2012 bane

Monday, July 29, 2013

Popular Idioms Translated to Actually Make Sense Today

Popular Idioms Translated to Actually Make Sense Today

When we tell the future children of the world that you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, they'll stare at their iPad and wonder what the hell a book is. Does that old fart mean an app? When we tell them to scratch our back and we'll scratch theirs, they'll wonder why are we even talking to each other in IRL. And when we say close, but no cigar... well, actually even I have no idea why that ever made sense.

Read more...

Source: http://gizmodo.com/popular-idioms-translated-to-actually-make-sense-today-957992497

Wendi Deng Sebastian De La Cruz The Last of Us Yeezus Flag Day 2013 UFC 161 College World Series

The iPad will always be better than Android

Old Yesterday, 09:56 PM ? #1

Senior Member

?

Join Date: Mar 2013

Posts: 894


Because of a fundamental constraint in Android's design.

Basically, an iPad can prioritize one function and Android cannot. So when the UI is in use, the iPad is devoting all of its power to making the experience responsive, while Android makes the user wait in line with the various other tasks going on.

Which means that any given two tablets, with the same amount of power but one is iOS and one is Android, the iOS tablet will always be more responsive.

And Android cannot fix this without rewriting the entire OS. So basically, unless Android manages to open up an enormous speed advantage over iOS (unlikely), it will always lag in responsiveness.

If you've ever used an android tablet, and then an ipad, you'd get it immediately. the ipad is a much better experience.

desura is online now ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:01 PM ? #2

Diamond Member

?

Join Date: Nov 2005

Posts: 3,629


Quote:

unless Android manages to open up an enormous speed advantage over iOS (unlikely)

New N7 vs iPad Mini. __________________

Quote:

Getting tech news from CNN is like getting politics from Anandtech.

poofyhairguy is offline ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:03 PM ? #3

Diamond Member

?

Join Date: Jun 2000

Location: Reading, PA

Posts: 6,824


Quote:

Because of a fundamental constraint in Android's design.

Basically, an iPad can prioritize one function and Android cannot. So when the UI is in use, the iPad is devoting all of its power to making the experience responsive, while Android makes the user wait in line with the various other tasks going on.

Which means that any given two tablets, with the same amount of power but one is iOS and one is Android, the iOS tablet will always be more responsive.

And Android cannot fix this without rewriting the entire OS. So basically, unless Android manages to open up an enormous speed advantage over iOS (unlikely), it will always lag in responsiveness.

If you've ever used an android tablet, and then an ipad, you'd get it immediately. the ipad is a much better experience.

You're not comparing apples to apples here, a 32gb Ipad mini will cost $430 vs 2nd gen 32gb Google Nexus 7 is $250.00. For me, Android has more functionality, is cheaper and I'm not getting ass-raped by apple's prices.

Quote:

There?s simply no two ways around the reality; the Nexus 7 runs circles ? multiple circles ? around the iPad mini. Clocking in at a Geekbench score of 2,684, that?s three and a half times faster than the iPad mini?s 766!
http://www.idownloadblog.com/2013/07...ad-mini-video/


Last edited by Yazoo; Yesterday at 10:11 PM.

Yazoo is offline ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:17 PM ? #4

Lifer

?

Join Date: Aug 2001

Location: New York

Posts: 17,662


When the hardware is "good enough" and most common apps aren't too demanding, whatever prioritization iOS does won't matter.

I'd argue that point is now, though it will benefit Android tablets to keep having faster and faster CPUs and GPUs in their SoCs every year. Throw enough hardware at the problem and keep optimizing the operating system. That's really how Android has become much smoother and more useable since Honeycomb until Jellybean.

If you used Android tablets since the Nexus 7, you'd see whatever benefits iOS has on iPad doesn't matter quite as much anymore. The iPads do have decent GPUs, though, and a lot of nice tablet optimized apps, but the gap between the two is closing fast.

It doesn't help that Apple is behind Google/ASUS in the 7"/8" space. They got beat to the first punch, and they look bad when they don't even have a "retina" display yet on the Mini when they were the ones adverting the benefits of such a high DPI.

I do like the iPad, though. I got the iPad 1 right after it launched, and was one of the few people not laughing at it as being a "giant iPhone" prior to launch. It's one of only two products from Apple that I've ever really wanted to own, the other being the original and now the new Haswell-based Macbook Air. But Android is beating Apple at the lower price points in terms of value, and Microsoft has productivity locked up with the Surface Pro at the high end. I don't really see a need for me to get or own an iPad, but if someone gave me one I certainly wouldn't cry.

__________________
Official member of the new ATOT Night Crew
(copy above line into your signature to join!)

Proud Vampire-American


Last edited by Crono; Yesterday at 10:27 PM.

Crono is online now ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:29 PM ? #5

Diamond Member

?

Join Date: Jun 2000

Posts: 4,615


Quote:

Because of a fundamental constraint in Android's design.

Basically, an iPad can prioritize one function and Android cannot. So when the UI is in use, the iPad is devoting all of its power to making the experience responsive, while Android makes the user wait in line with the various other tasks going on.

Which means that any given two tablets, with the same amount of power but one is iOS and one is Android, the iOS tablet will always be more responsive.

And Android cannot fix this without rewriting the entire OS. So basically, unless Android manages to open up an enormous speed advantage over iOS (unlikely), it will always lag in responsiveness.

If you've ever used an android tablet, and then an ipad, you'd get it immediately. the ipad is a much better experience.

I've used an Android tablet, and then an iPad tablet (and I own both). I continually reach for the Android tablet because there are just things iOS can't do.

So thank you for your commentary, but it doesn't hold true for everyone.

Edit, and as for your responsiveness argument. I don't really notice a difference unless I'm actively looking for it (Especially on 2012/2013 tablets). The only time I ever really get lag nowadays is when I have too many program that I run in the background (actively running).


Last edited by zerogear; Yesterday at 10:32 PM.

zerogear is offline ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:02 PM ? #6

Moderator
Peripherals

?

Join Date: Mar 2000

Location: Tucson, Arizona

Posts: 22,658


IMHO, until it is opened up to USB (likely, never!), the iPad is only an entertainment device. An Android tablet is capable of real work involving passing material between devices.

__________________
Corky-G - Tucson, AZ

"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a congress." John Adams

corkyg is offline ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:16 PM ? #7

Lifer

?

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 18,633


the iPad ties in with some of my Akai Pro studio equipment, Android never will. That's Android's biggest downfalls imho, 3rd party support. My car stereo ties in flawlessly with iOS devices, it has half baked BT Android support. My friend is a professional producer and his iPad is an integral piece of his studio. I have a room full of iOS accessories, I have the Nexus 4 and there are like 3 official accessories for it and a handful of oddball ones that aren't made for it but sort of work.

I can see why some people Prefer Android, but for my needs I already know it will never do what I need it do.

__________________

Quote:

No, no, they exist. I've seen them.

They're not usually like hot-hot, but they're like hit it and quit it able.

QueBert is online now ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:18 PM ? #8

Platinum Member

?

Join Date: Aug 2005

Location: Houston, TX

Posts: 2,389


New Nexus 7 16GB - $230.
iPad mini 16GB - $330.

Nexus 7 wins.

New Nexus 7 32GB - $270.
iPad mini 32GB - $430.

Nexus 7 wins even more.

New Nexus 7 32GB LTE (carrier agnostic) - $350
iPad mini 32GB LTE - $560 (pick carrier at time of purchase)

Nexus 7 has to be pulled away because it's beating the iPad so badly.

And then there's the following:
Better screen
NFC
Wireless charging
Pocketable (well, my pockets anyway)
Faster

Some will say "Oh, the iPad mini hasn't been updated yet!" So? Who cares. If a person asks for my recommendation today, I will wholeheartedly tell them to get a Nexus 7. Period.

I assure you, if the general public actually cared about app performance, they would have never bought Android devices. Android pre-4.0 was atrocious. Didn't stop it from becoming the dominant mobile OS in the world.

__________________
Intel Core i7 2600K | Radeon HD 7970 | MSI P67A-GD80 | 240G OCZ Vertex 3 | 16GB RAM | Dell U2713HM | Windows 8 Pro
2012 Mac mini | 256GB Samsung 830 + 1TB HDD | 16GB RAM
15" Retina MacBook Pro | iPhone 5 | iPad 4

dagamer34 is online now ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:41 PM ? #10

Senior Member

?

Join Date: Mar 2013

Posts: 894


Eh, I'm comparing like a Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 w/ dualcore 1.4ghz processors from 2012 and android 4 vs an old ipad 2 which has dualcore 1ghz processors and iOS6 and I think it came out in 2011?

iPad 2 is a lot better.

And the main use of these tablets is in reading stuff like in a browser or interacting with apps. So yeah, it is important to be super responsive and lucid.

and the newer android device is much more frustrating.

desura is online now ? Reply With Quote


Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts


HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.


Source: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2333500&goto=newpost

roy orbison the third man 2012 nfl draft order mohamed sanu chris polk rueben randle mike trout

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Snedeker takes Canadian Open lead

OAKVILLE, Ontario (AP) ? Brandt Snedeker was on seventh tee when he noticed something wasn't quite right.

He couldn't find Hunter Mahan's name at the top of the Canadian Open leaderboard.

"I looked at my caddie, and I go, 'What's going on?'" Snedeker said. "He goes, 'I think Hunter had to leave because (his wife) went into labor.'"

His caddie was right.

Mahan, the second-round leader at 13 under, withdrew Saturday to rush home to Dallas for the birth of his first child Saturday, leaving a big opening for Snedeker.

"Kind of left the tournament wide open," Snedeker said. "Hunter was going to be hard to catch because he was playing so good. The way he drives the golf ball on this golf course, he was going to play really well on the weekend. For me to catch him, I knew I was going to have to shoot something really low."

Snedeker had a 9-under 63 at rainy Glen Abbey to take the lead after the third round. He won the Pebble Beach National Pro-Am in February for his fifth PGA Tour victory.

"I know how to handle it and I know what to expect tomorrow especially on a golf course like this," Snedeker said. "I'm not too concerned about my number right now. I know what I have to do tomorrow."

The 2012 FedExCup champion had nine birdies in a bogey-free round, playing the front nine in 6-under 29.

"You always feel like you're exactly one swing away from hitting something off the planet or something like that," Snedeker said. "I felt like I managed my game really well today."

Mahan withdrew before he was scheduled to tee off Saturday in the round that was delayed 80 minutes because of lightning.

"I received exciting news a short time ago that my wife Kandi has gone into labor with our first child," Mahan said in a statement. "Kandi and I are thrilled about the addition to the Mahan family and we look forward to returning to the RBC Canadian Open in the coming years."

Sweden's David Lingmerth was a stroke back after a 65, and Matt Kuchar and Jason Bohn were 12 under. Kuchar had a 64, and Bohn shot 66.

"The birth of a child is a truly magical, special thing. You may get it once in your lifetime. It just doesn't happen that often," Kuchar said. "Hunter right now is playing some of the best golf in the world. It kind of gives the rest of us a chance with him not in the field."

Dustin Johnson also shot 63, good for a tie for fifth at 11 under with John Merrick (72), Greg Owen (67), Charley Hoffman (67) and Kyle Stanley (66).

Merrick, two strokes behind Mahan on Friday after matching the course record with a second-round 62, played alone in the third round after Mahan withdrew. Merrick declined to playoff alongside a non-scoring marker.

David Hearn was the top Canadian, shooting a 68 to reach 5 under. He made the cut Friday by birdieing his final three holes.

"I felt good yesterday finishing the way I did," Hearn said. "I didn't play my best getting to the weekend but it's a pretty tight leaderboard."

Mike Weir was 3 under after a 73.

"It was kind of adventurous and not very profitable at all," Weir said. "Didn't make anything again and struggled a little bit at times. Just never seemed to get in the flow of the round."

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/snedeker-takes-canadian-open-lead-223356444.html

bristol motor speedway prometheus grand canyon skywalk tonga pid corned beef hash the walking dead season 2 finale

Twitter report: What Saints players are saying about Day 3 of practice

Junior Galette ?(@JuniorG93)
Thank you #WhodatNation For Coming To Support us in that Heat u Have No Idea how Much it Helps! #SaintsFans = #BestFans

Joseph Morgan ?(@jmthegreat)
We have absolutely the best fan base in the NFL. Everyone is truly passionate about the team and very personable #whodatnation

Jose Maltos (?@josemaltos19)
Graciias Dios excelente practica

Andrew Tiller (?@BigTill66)
First day with pads on!!!! Lets get it!!! #whodat!!!!

Thomas Morstead (?@thomasmorstead)
Training Camp Day 3 #WhoDat #Saints #FullPads

Jed Collins ?(@JedCollins45)
Suns out, fans are here, pads go on!! #AreYouReady?

Chase Thomas ?(@CTcard44)
pads..

Roman Harper (?@Harp41)
Determination and persistence will make any good man .. a great man.

Cameron Jordan ?(@camjordan94)
Today was a hot one saints will get better everyday #whodat

Andrew Tiller ?(@BigTill66)
It felt good being back in pads today!

Source: http://prod.www.saints.clubs.nfl.com/news-and-events/article-1/Twitter-report-What-Saints-players-are-saying-about-Day-3-of-practice/9dd6cbb5-d03b-4512-a45f-95ea407998f9

sherri shepherd sherri shepherd arkansas razorbacks trisomy 18 ozzie guillen ozzie guillen buster posey